Trump Impeachment Saga: Quid Pro Quo

Written By Kamran

The saga of Trump and Impeachment seems predictable than weather or human conscience, this time it is becoming clear enough for global media.

The Trump Impeachment Saga is now easy to digest by looking into contours of political events. As the anger and discernment seem a normal activity of US politics.

My statements are drawn in the shade of incessant tweets of Mr Trump when I do not consider the Trumpian Idea, then might be vague generalizations occur.

The tweets carry a burden of the trust, which he responds, consider this for instance, “This attempted impeachment is nothing more than an illegal partisan coup that will be based on recent sentiment, badly fail at the voting booth.”

Read This: Trumps Removal or Acquittal

The sentimentality of the saga is going in a fictive way, “As I learn more and more each day, I’m coming to the conclusion that what is taking place is not an impeachment, it is a COUP intended to take away the power of the people.

On Thursday, Mick Mulvaney (Chief of staff) argued in making a normalization attempt, that Donald Trump held Ukrainian Aid just to inquire or investigate the conspiracy 2016 US elections.

He said, “There was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukrainian military aid and any investigation into the 2016 elections.” Further said, “The President never told me to withhold any money until the Ukrainians did anything related to the server. The only reasons we were holding the money was because of concern about the lack of support from other nations and concerns over corruption.”

Read This: Trump and Nancy Pelosi: Head To Head

Democrats are arguing to withhold the articles of Impeachment before precise inquiry may come out of the quagmire, this might be possible by eyewitnesses, in which Mick Mulvey is at top of the list, as he is currently serving in President Donald Trumps cabinet, and managing a budget affairs.

We should follow the course of historiography, in the political realm, 'wait and see' approach is precise to have a better understanding. As the US elections were never so predictive, yet this time the aura is becoming clear to some extent, yet earlier to predict in a concrete way. We can have a balanced approach in observing while considering every bit to the serious manner.

The writer is a researcher, with interest in International Affairs (US), sociology and philosophy in particular.